We Structure Transactions. Contracts Are the Outcome Not the Starting Point.

At Inrigo Legal Consultancy FZE, we do not approach engagements as contract‑drafting exercises. We structure transactions, align commercial intent with legal architecture, and then draft contracts that reflect that structure.

A contract is only as effective as the transaction it supports. Our role is to ensure that risk allocation, control, leverage, and enforceability are built into the deal itself not patched into clauses later.

We begin before the document. Every engagement starts with understanding the commercial objective, the power dynamics between parties, financial exposure and recovery risk, operational dependencies, and exit scenarios if the relationship breaks down. Only once the transaction is properly structured do we draft the contract.

Transaction structuring at Inrigo involves defining rights, obligations, and control at a commercial level, designing risk allocation that reflects real‑world behaviour, anticipating failure and not just success, and aligning legal mechanisms with business realities. The contract then becomes a tool of implementation and enforcement, not a theoretical document.

Commercial and Business Transactions

• Service and consultancy arrangements
• Financial and Management Reporting Review
• Vendor, supplier, and distribution structures
• Agency and intermediary models
• Retainer and long‑term advisory relationships

Shareholder, Partner and Ownership Transactions

• Shareholder and partnership arrangements
• Joint venture structuring
• Founder and investor frameworks
• Share transfer, buy‑out, and exit mechanics
• Deadlock and separation structures

Corporate Control and Governance Structures

• Allocation of management and decision‑making authority
• Director and officer roles and accountability
• Governance frameworks embedded into contracts
• Control protections for minority and majority stakeholders

Project Based and Industry Specific Transactions

• EPC and construction project structures
• Sub‑contracting and risk‑pass‑through models
• Fit‑out and design transaction frameworks
• Sector‑specific operational structures

Financial, Risk and Recovery Driven Transactions

• Settlement and exit arrangements
• Debt restructuring and recovery structures
• Payment security and enforcement frameworks
• Risk‑containment and downside‑protection mechanisms

Because we structure transactions first, our contracts reflect commercial leverage accurately, allocate risk intentionally and not accidentally, survive breakdowns in relationships, and support enforcement and recovery if required. We draft with dispute, enforcement, and negotiation in mind, not just compliance.

A well‑structured transaction reduces friction. A poorly structured one creates disputes no matter how well drafted the contract appears.

• Strategic transaction advisory engagements
• Project‑based structuring mandates
• Retainer‑based commercial and corporate advisory

Every mandate is bespoke, confidential, and deeply contextual.

“We do not draft contracts to record deals. We structure deals so contracts protect outcomes.”